Ladbrokes and McClean bookmakers stop working to block rival shops' expansions
20 May 2013
Two bookies have failed in High Court quotes to block proposed extensions to rival wagering stores in Belfast.
A judge dismissed attempts by both Ladbrokes and McClean bookies to judicially review preparation choices in favour of Toals and Sean Graham.
The judge at Belfast High Court said he would provide reasons for his decision at a later stage.
The legal procedures had actually been released over applications for the expansion of two shops in the city centre.
the yohaig code first, run by Toals in Pottinger's Entry, includes a proposition to extend out into the previous passport workplace on High Street.
In the second, Sean Graham is looking for to increase the area of its King Street wagering workplace by taking control of a hair stylists on Castle Street.
'Disgruntled rival'
Lawyers for Ladbrokes and McClean bookies declared both were attempting to get round a requirement of gaming legislation to show demand.
During the case the two business acknowledged their interest as commercial competitors.
Points were likewise raised about compliance with policies securing a sanctuary.
But counsel for Sean Graham argued that the legal challenge was the act of an unhappy rival, exclusively concerned with the effect on its own business.
According to the Planning Service's legal agents, neither proposed development includes changes to structures visible from the street.
Following the verdict, Sean Graham bookies, which employ 150 staff in 30 stores throughout Northern Ireland, outlined its plan for contemporary properties and more jobs.
Speaking outside the court, general manager Chris Deery said: "We are really eager to progress with our prepare for an extended King Street/Castle Street which will improve the consumer experience and help to revitalise the immediate location in addition to bringing additional employment."
Mr Deery added that the business was now aiming to proceed with the extensions "as rapidly as possible".
